Why there was no such thing as a National Bank in the United States before 1996


When I started working for Valley National Bank in 1990, I was already familiar with the term "National Bank". It seems like every other bank that I had ever heard of had the word "National" in it. But national banking, that is, banking across state lines, was illegal before 1996. And I got to watch a company gamble on the chance that the law would change. That company was Bank One.

The reason that banks couldn't be national had to do with their fragility after the Wall Street crash of 1929. By law, banks had to be contained in states. And that meant that if a bank failed, it would only affect that particular state, not the entire country.

But in 1996, true "national banking", what we take for granted today, became legal. And in preparation for that, Bank One had been buying up banks all over the country, including Valley National Bank of Arizona.



The four years that I watched Bank One make the transition from being some kind of distant "hands-off" benefactor to preparing to run its business as a true "national" bank was like watching someone at a casino throwing the dice. And in 1996, when national banking became legal, they won.

And since the term "national bank" had always been around, it was a change that no one outside of the banking industry even noticed. But it was a revolution.



JP Morgan Chase now controls what used to be Bank One, and Valley National Bank, from New York. It's a strong, national bank. A real national bank.

Image at the top of this post: The Valley National Bank sign on the Professional Building, southeast corner of Central and Monroe, Phoenix, Arizona. From the 1957 Annual Report.

Thank you to my patrons on Patreon who help support History Adventuring! To support History Adventuring on Patreon, please go to patreon.com/PhoenixHistoryAdventuring. Thank you!

What Patreon is http://bradhallart.blogspot.com/2016/03/supporting-creators-on-web-with-patreon.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why cars in the future won't need stop signs, red lights, or stripes on the road

Image
Time-travel with me into the future. Where we're going, we'll still need roads, but our cars won't need the kind of stuff that human drivers need, like stop signs, or stuff painted on the road. And if you're already panicking that computers will take over, don't worry, they already have. The fact that you're reading this right now combines so much amazing computing power that it would have been unthinkable to anyone in the 1960s, or '70s, when I was a kid. Speaking of being in the geriatric age group, if you're like me or older, you took a lot of pride in knowing the rules of the road, such as what to do at a stop sign if four cars approach at the same time, the difference between a "yield" sign and a "merge" sign, or maybe how to parallel park. But calm down there old-timer, that type of knowledge will just be as quaint as how to use a horse and buggy is nowadays. Sorry! The best way to picture how traffic will flow in the future is
Read more

Watching a neighborhood grow and change in Phoenix, Arizona

Image
I stopped to take a closer look yesterday at where the old Circle K had been in my neighborhood, which is a suburb of Phoenix. And it's got me to thinking about how much Phoenix grows and changes over the years, and how people feel about it. This particular neighborhood was built in the mid 1980s, when there had been only a smattering of houses and a community college (Glendale Community College, built in 1965). There are some houses that I can tell are from the 1970s, and a few even older, but what happened here is that the neighborhood suddenly appeared in 1985 or thereabouts. There are three shopping centers on the corner of 67th Avenue and Peoria - the one in the photo is called "Peoria Station", and it was designed to kinda look like a train station. The other three are called Westporte Village, Brittany Square, and Crossroads Plaza. I've lived in this neighborhood for a very long time, and no one ever uses those names, even though the signs are still up. But the
Read more

Why did Adolf Hitler always have such a bad haircut?

Image
As someone who has been interested in history since I was a little kid, I've always asked the most childish questions, and quite often never got an answer. As a kid, I was told to run along and play, and don't bother the grownups, so I set my questions aside to work on when I myself became a grownup. But some questions I really haven't found a satisfactory answer for, and get thrown away as I find myself learning the more important stuff. I now understand the grownups, but the kid in me still has childish questions like "Why did Adolf Hitler always have such a bad haircut?" The first question to ask is whether a particular style (whether hair, clothing, etc.) was in style at the time. The moustache was, and you can Google a photo of Charlie Chaplin, who wore the same style of moustache at the time, and quite stylishly. The wide lapels were in style in the 1930s, as was were the tall shirt collars and small ties. But the haircut wasn't - it's just awful. Me
Read more