Why distance is always given in minutes in Phoenix and Los Angeles


I've really only lived in two places in my adult life, Phoenix and Los Angeles, so I don't know about the rest of the country, or the rest of the world, but people there have always given distance in minutes, not miles. So I've learned to translate that one minute means one mile. That means that if a housing development is thirty miles from a particular destination, it's described as "thirty minutes away".

The assumption is sixty miles an hour on the freeway, with no traffic. In Los Angeles, that's an interesting theory, but I've seen traffic move so slowly that I've been lucky to go ten miles in thirty minutes there. Even in Phoenix, where there's a lot less traffic, the "minute equals a mile" equation seems to be kinda iffy. From where I'm writing this right now, near Glendale Community College, at 59th Avenue and Olive, I'm "thirty minutes away from Scottsdale" - that is, thirty miles away. But at this time of the morning I doubt whether that formula would stand.

At first, when people started telling me that someplace is "fifteen minutes away", I'd ask, "Thank you! So, how far away is it?" and get a grumbling answer that they had just told me: fifteen minutes. After a while I learned to accept the minute equals a mile formula, and not argue with people, or I'd risk getting a punch in the nose. The minute equals a mile thing is Real Estate Agent-speak, and most people have adapted that, and don't even hear themselves saying it.

As someone who bikes, walks, takes public transportation, as well as rides in cars, I'm always interested in physical distances, not Real Estate Agent-speak. I can do a leisurely walk of half a mile (which is to my local McDonalds) in less than ten minutes. My walking pace is about 2-3 miles per hour. I can pedal that distance is less than half that time. Of course in a car, the time is so small that it's barely measurable.

Most of the people I've known in Phoenix and Los Angeles can only measure distances in car time. And cars do give the illusion of taking no time at all, which is why so many people are so surprised that they spend so much time in their cars. And that may be why that if they expected someplace to be fifteen minutes away, they're so aggravated when it takes them forty-five minutes to get there.

Thank you for traveling with me, in distance and minutes!

Image at the top of this post: The I-17 Freeway when it was new in the 1960s, Phoenix, Arizona.
Become a PhD (Phoenix History Detective) with Brad today on Patreon!

Click here to become a Patron!
History Adventuring posts are shared there daily including "then and now" photos, billboards, aerials, videos, and super high-definition photos of historic Phoenix, Arizona. Discounts for seniors, students, teachers, and veterans.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why cars in the future won't need stop signs, red lights, or stripes on the road

Image
Time-travel with me into the future. Where we're going, we'll still need roads, but our cars won't need the kind of stuff that human drivers need, like stop signs, or stuff painted on the road. And if you're already panicking that computers will take over, don't worry, they already have. The fact that you're reading this right now combines so much amazing computing power that it would have been unthinkable to anyone in the 1960s, or '70s, when I was a kid. Speaking of being in the geriatric age group, if you're like me or older, you took a lot of pride in knowing the rules of the road, such as what to do at a stop sign if four cars approach at the same time, the difference between a "yield" sign and a "merge" sign, or maybe how to parallel park. But calm down there old-timer, that type of knowledge will just be as quaint as how to use a horse and buggy is nowadays. Sorry! The best way to picture how traffic will flow in the future is
Read more

Watching a neighborhood grow and change in Phoenix, Arizona

Image
I stopped to take a closer look yesterday at where the old Circle K had been in my neighborhood, which is a suburb of Phoenix. And it's got me to thinking about how much Phoenix grows and changes over the years, and how people feel about it. This particular neighborhood was built in the mid 1980s, when there had been only a smattering of houses and a community college (Glendale Community College, built in 1965). There are some houses that I can tell are from the 1970s, and a few even older, but what happened here is that the neighborhood suddenly appeared in 1985 or thereabouts. There are three shopping centers on the corner of 67th Avenue and Peoria - the one in the photo is called "Peoria Station", and it was designed to kinda look like a train station. The other three are called Westporte Village, Brittany Square, and Crossroads Plaza. I've lived in this neighborhood for a very long time, and no one ever uses those names, even though the signs are still up. But the
Read more

Why did Adolf Hitler always have such a bad haircut?

Image
As someone who has been interested in history since I was a little kid, I've always asked the most childish questions, and quite often never got an answer. As a kid, I was told to run along and play, and don't bother the grownups, so I set my questions aside to work on when I myself became a grownup. But some questions I really haven't found a satisfactory answer for, and get thrown away as I find myself learning the more important stuff. I now understand the grownups, but the kid in me still has childish questions like "Why did Adolf Hitler always have such a bad haircut?" The first question to ask is whether a particular style (whether hair, clothing, etc.) was in style at the time. The moustache was, and you can Google a photo of Charlie Chaplin, who wore the same style of moustache at the time, and quite stylishly. The wide lapels were in style in the 1930s, as was were the tall shirt collars and small ties. But the haircut wasn't - it's just awful. Me
Read more