Slow children at play signs in old-time and modern Phoenix, Arizona


Like everyone who drives, certain signs are absolutely invisible to me. You can't read everything, every sign, as you drive by. I've lived in this neighborhood for over twenty-five years, and if you had asked me if there was a "Slow children at play" sign just a block away from my house, I wouldn't have known. Of course there is, it's been there since 1985, when this neighborhood was built, replacing, to the best of my knowledge, cotton fields.

And the only reason that I'm noticing it now is that I noticed that the neighborhood just north of me just put up a brand new "Slow children playing" sign. And today on my walk I took some photos so I could study them more carefully without looking like an extremely strange guy standing there staring at a sign. I know that you understand, but most people wouldn't, it would just creep them out, or they would probably think that I'm some kind of inspector.

So let's take a closer look at the older sign. Other than the joke that I've always heard that you should watch out for "slow children playing", it looks like the little boy (there is no girl on the sign) is wearing knickerbockers. That is, short pants with long socks, what golfers call "plus 4s". And I'm sure that there was a time when children dressed like that, but it was sure before 1985. I was a kid in the 1960s, which was quite a while ago, and kids didn't dress like that. If you're older than me, you may remember kids wearing knickers and high socks that met just below the knee, but mostly I've just seen it in old black-and-white movies. 1940s? 30s? Kids wore rolled-up bluejeans in the fifties, so I'm just gonna say pre-1950s.

So I guess no one noticed when year after year the same graphic was used.


The more modern sign still says "Slow children at play", but the boy is now wearing shorts. The girl appears to have a pony tail, and is wearing a skirt. I suppose in a sign a skirt is used to quickly identify someone as female, but I've never seen little girls playing in skirts. The modern girl would be wearing shorts like the boy, and of course both of them would have a neck, and feet. But now I'm quibbling - these images are meant to be recognized quickly, like restroom signs.

The good news about all of this is that in a longish life I know that most people don't need signs to tell them to watch out for children. There are a tiny percentage of people who really don't seem to have the sense God gave an onion, and everyone else just seems to hope that putting up a sign will convince them not to run into kids. In the meantime, more and more signs will go up, and they will become increasing invisible. And that's fine, because the signs aren't really necessary, and never have been.
History Adventuring on Patreon

 Click here to become a Patron!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why cars in the future won't need stop signs, red lights, or stripes on the road

Image
Time-travel with me into the future. Where we're going, we'll still need roads, but our cars won't need the kind of stuff that human drivers need, like stop signs, or stuff painted on the road. And if you're already panicking that computers will take over, don't worry, they already have. The fact that you're reading this right now combines so much amazing computing power that it would have been unthinkable to anyone in the 1960s, or '70s, when I was a kid. Speaking of being in the geriatric age group, if you're like me or older, you took a lot of pride in knowing the rules of the road, such as what to do at a stop sign if four cars approach at the same time, the difference between a "yield" sign and a "merge" sign, or maybe how to parallel park. But calm down there old-timer, that type of knowledge will just be as quaint as how to use a horse and buggy is nowadays. Sorry! The best way to picture how traffic will flow in the future is ...
Read more

Watching a neighborhood grow and change in Phoenix, Arizona

Image
I stopped to take a closer look yesterday at where the old Circle K had been in my neighborhood, which is a suburb of Phoenix. And it's got me to thinking about how much Phoenix grows and changes over the years, and how people feel about it. This particular neighborhood was built in the mid 1980s, when there had been only a smattering of houses and a community college (Glendale Community College, built in 1965). There are some houses that I can tell are from the 1970s, and a few even older, but what happened here is that the neighborhood suddenly appeared in 1985 or thereabouts. There are three shopping centers on the corner of 67th Avenue and Peoria - the one in the photo is called "Peoria Station", and it was designed to kinda look like a train station. The other three are called Westporte Village, Brittany Square, and Crossroads Plaza. I've lived in this neighborhood for a very long time, and no one ever uses those names, even though the signs are still up. But the...
Read more

Why did Adolf Hitler always have such a bad haircut?

Image
As someone who has been interested in history since I was a little kid, I've always asked the most childish questions, and quite often never got an answer. As a kid, I was told to run along and play, and don't bother the grownups, so I set my questions aside to work on when I myself became a grownup. But some questions I really haven't found a satisfactory answer for, and get thrown away as I find myself learning the more important stuff. I now understand the grownups, but the kid in me still has childish questions like "Why did Adolf Hitler always have such a bad haircut?" The first question to ask is whether a particular style (whether hair, clothing, etc.) was in style at the time. The moustache was, and you can Google a photo of Charlie Chaplin, who wore the same style of moustache at the time, and quite stylishly. The wide lapels were in style in the 1930s, as was were the tall shirt collars and small ties. But the haircut wasn't - it's just awful. Me...
Read more