The pushback to the melting pot in the history of the human race


You really don't hear the term "melting pot" all that much anymore. I remember hearing it a lot when I was a kid, and I understood that it represented how different people from all over the world would just "melt" together, and historical differences would become just that: historical.

Of course the pushback to the idea of a melting pot isn't anything new. From the first time someone said, "Mama, he's (or she's) makin' eyes at me!" about someone from another tribe, the melting pot had begun, along with the pushback. And it's quite an epic struggle, with the elders standing for the purity of their tribe, and the young people being guided by, ahem, more primitive instincts (stop that giggling back there, but yes, that's what I mean!).

There is, of course, only one kind of human, the concept of race is a nonsensical one. There are different-looking people, the way that there are different-looking dogs, but as long as a species can produce viable offspring, they're essentially all the same. And that's what people are: a single species.

Nowadays I see a lot of the promotion of some type of racial purity. You can call it the "New Klux Klan" if you want to, but it's all the same, just a resistance to a melting pot. I've seen it all of my life, and while I have hopes for the future, I can't imagine that it will all be resolved in my lifetime, even if I live to get really old.

It all becomes a struggle, with some people cheering for "their side!" Speaking for myself, I get a big kick out of looking at history, which began when I started doing my family genealogy, but it's just for fun. I have a sign that says "Parking for Scottish Only" in my garage, but it's just a bit of silliness to me, like the old Mike Meyers skits on Saturday Night Live. Of course anyone can park there, as long as they have my permission (and maybe are bringing some beer!).

There really is no such thing as "reverse discrimination" - there's just inequality. And I know that it surprises people who start cheering for "their side" (as if there was one!) when it comes to race. Some people will say things such as someone being "not black enough" for them, and it's an indication of their interest in the kind of "racial purity" that the "Melting Pot" melts.

If you're wondering why I'm so optimistic for the future of the human race blending together, it's because I believe in the power of love. And I do mean that from the standpoint of the heart, and also the body. It's only natural.

You've got to be taught
To hate and fear,
You've got to be taught
From year to year,
It's got to be drummed
In your dear little ear
You've got to be carefully taught.

You've got to be taught to be afraid
Of people whose eyes are oddly made,
And people whose skin is a different shade,
You've got to be carefully taught.

You've got to be taught before it's too late,
Before you are six or seven or eight,
To hate all the people your relatives hate,
You've got to be carefully taught!
If you like pictures of old-time Phoenix, please become a member of History Adventuring on Patreon. I share a LOT of cool old photos there, copyright-free, with no advertising. Your support makes it happen! Thank you!

Click here to become a Patron!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why cars in the future won't need stop signs, red lights, or stripes on the road

Image
Time-travel with me into the future. Where we're going, we'll still need roads, but our cars won't need the kind of stuff that human drivers need, like stop signs, or stuff painted on the road. And if you're already panicking that computers will take over, don't worry, they already have. The fact that you're reading this right now combines so much amazing computing power that it would have been unthinkable to anyone in the 1960s, or '70s, when I was a kid. Speaking of being in the geriatric age group, if you're like me or older, you took a lot of pride in knowing the rules of the road, such as what to do at a stop sign if four cars approach at the same time, the difference between a "yield" sign and a "merge" sign, or maybe how to parallel park. But calm down there old-timer, that type of knowledge will just be as quaint as how to use a horse and buggy is nowadays. Sorry! The best way to picture how traffic will flow in the future is
Read more

Watching a neighborhood grow and change in Phoenix, Arizona

Image
I stopped to take a closer look yesterday at where the old Circle K had been in my neighborhood, which is a suburb of Phoenix. And it's got me to thinking about how much Phoenix grows and changes over the years, and how people feel about it. This particular neighborhood was built in the mid 1980s, when there had been only a smattering of houses and a community college (Glendale Community College, built in 1965). There are some houses that I can tell are from the 1970s, and a few even older, but what happened here is that the neighborhood suddenly appeared in 1985 or thereabouts. There are three shopping centers on the corner of 67th Avenue and Peoria - the one in the photo is called "Peoria Station", and it was designed to kinda look like a train station. The other three are called Westporte Village, Brittany Square, and Crossroads Plaza. I've lived in this neighborhood for a very long time, and no one ever uses those names, even though the signs are still up. But the
Read more

Why did Adolf Hitler always have such a bad haircut?

Image
As someone who has been interested in history since I was a little kid, I've always asked the most childish questions, and quite often never got an answer. As a kid, I was told to run along and play, and don't bother the grownups, so I set my questions aside to work on when I myself became a grownup. But some questions I really haven't found a satisfactory answer for, and get thrown away as I find myself learning the more important stuff. I now understand the grownups, but the kid in me still has childish questions like "Why did Adolf Hitler always have such a bad haircut?" The first question to ask is whether a particular style (whether hair, clothing, etc.) was in style at the time. The moustache was, and you can Google a photo of Charlie Chaplin, who wore the same style of moustache at the time, and quite stylishly. The wide lapels were in style in the 1930s, as was were the tall shirt collars and small ties. But the haircut wasn't - it's just awful. Me
Read more